• Christof Meerwald (64/64) Oct 14 2001 I have extracted 2 test-cases from the STLport 4.0 I/O streams library w...
• Damian (8/92) Oct 17 2001 I email the c.announce newsgroup with a similar problem on the

Christof Meerwald <cmeerw web.de> writes:

I have extracted 2 test-cases from the STLport 4.0 I/O streams library where
DM doesn't behave as expected:

  template<class T>
  struct A
  { };

  template<class T, class T2>
  struct S
  { };

  template<class T, class T2>
  int operator<<(S<T, T2> &s, T x)
  {
    return 1;
  }

  template<class T2>
  int operator<<(S<char, T2> &s, char x)
  {
    return 0;
  }

  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  {
    S<char, A<char> > s;

    return s << 'a';
    // Error: ambiguous reference to symbol
    // Had: operator <<(S<>&,T)
    // and: operator <<(S<>&,char )
  }


...and the second test-case:

  template<class T>
  struct A
  { };

  template<class T, class T2>
  struct S
  {
    int operator<<(int x)
    {
      return 0;
    }
  };

  template<class T2>
  int operator<<(S<char, T2> &s, signed char x)
  {
    return 1;
  }

  template<class T2>
  int operator<<(S<char, T2> &s, unsigned char x)
  {
    return 1;
  }


  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  {
    S<char, A<char> > s;
    int x = 0;

    return s << x;
    // Error: ambiguous reference to symbol
    // Had: operator <<(S<>&,signed char )
    // and: S<char ,A<char > >::operator <<(int )
  }


I would expect both programs to return 0 (that's what happens when compiling
them with GNU C++ 3.0.1).


bye, Christof

-- 
http://cmeerw.cjb.net                          Jabber: cmeerw jabber.at
mailto cmeerw at web.de                   ICQ: 93773535, Yahoo!: cmeerw

...and what have you contributed to the Net?

Damian <damiandixon netscape.net> writes:

I found that the problem was due to a forward declaration
and then an implementation being visible at the same time.

     // Error: ambiguous reference to symbol
     // Had: operator <<(S<>&,signed char )
     // and: S<char ,A<char > >::operator <<(int )

I email the c.announce newsgroup with a similar problem on the
3/10/2001. The beta compiler appeared to fix the problem with
STLport4.0.

Regards,
Damian


Christof Meerwald wrote:

 I have extracted 2 test-cases from the STLport 4.0 I/O streams library where
 DM doesn't behave as expected:
 
   template<class T>
   struct A
   { };
 
   template<class T, class T2>
   struct S
   { };
 
   template<class T, class T2>
   int operator<<(S<T, T2> &s, T x)
   {
     return 1;
   }
 
   template<class T2>
   int operator<<(S<char, T2> &s, char x)
   {
     return 0;
   }
 
   int main(int argc, char *argv[])
   {
     S<char, A<char> > s;
 
     return s << 'a';
     // Error: ambiguous reference to symbol
     // Had: operator <<(S<>&,T)
     // and: operator <<(S<>&,char )
   }
 
 
 ...and the second test-case:
 
   template<class T>
   struct A
   { };
 
   template<class T, class T2>
   struct S
   {
     int operator<<(int x)
     {
       return 0;
     }
   };
 
   template<class T2>
   int operator<<(S<char, T2> &s, signed char x)
   {
     return 1;
   }
 
   template<class T2>
   int operator<<(S<char, T2> &s, unsigned char x)
   {
     return 1;
   }
 
 
   int main(int argc, char *argv[])
   {
     S<char, A<char> > s;
     int x = 0;
 
     return s << x;
     // Error: ambiguous reference to symbol
     // Had: operator <<(S<>&,signed char )
     // and: S<char ,A<char > >::operator <<(int )
   }
 
 
 I would expect both programs to return 0 (that's what happens when compiling
 them with GNU C++ 3.0.1).
 
 
 bye, Christof