c++ - File with extension ".LNK" !!!; is this new to 8.39 beta?
- dan (10/10) Jan 29 2004 I hadn't seen this before. I went into the output folder to delete every...
- Phil Thompson (4/17) Jan 29 2004 Not sure if this will help you but did you know that a .lnk file is a
- dan (12/14) Jan 29 2004 That's exactly what I was talking about, Phil; it's what I meant by "sy...
- Walter (11/21) Jan 29 2004 everything in
- dan (2/6) Jan 29 2004 Yes, I realize now it's not the problem. Well, it was a shot...
I hadn't seen this before. I went into the output folder to delete everything in a last ditch attempt to stop the linker crashing, and I see a symbolic link there, with the name of my program. But I know I never created a symbolic link, so the compiler, or the IDDE must have created it. Then I checked its properties to see what it linked to, and it linked to nothing. As far as Windows is concerned, a file with ".lnk" extension that does not link to something else is a corrupt file. Would it be possible to use some extension that isn't reserved? E.g.: ".olk" for Optilink, or ".dml" for DM Linker... Cheers!
Jan 29 2004
Not sure if this will help you but did you know that a .lnk file is a Windows shortcut? Phil dan wrote:I hadn't seen this before. I went into the output folder to delete everything in a last ditch attempt to stop the linker crashing, and I see a symbolic link there, with the name of my program. But I know I never created a symbolic link, so the compiler, or the IDDE must have created it. Then I checked its properties to see what it linked to, and it linked to nothing. As far as Windows is concerned, a file with ".lnk" extension that does not link to something else is a corrupt file. Would it be possible to use some extension that isn't reserved? E.g.: ".olk" for Optilink, or ".dml" for DM Linker... Cheers!
Jan 29 2004
In article <bvbj96$2i2j$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Phil Thompson says...Not sure if this will help you but did you know that a .lnk file is a Windows shortcut?That's exactly what I was talking about, Phil; it's what I meant by "symbolic link". I had not seen this with previous versions of Digital Mars. Since I installed the 8.39 beta, two days ago, I've been having linker crashes that I could not trace. Today, it occurred to me that maybe the project files were corrupted, so I went to the output folder to delete them and start the project anew, and what I found there, to my astonishment, was a shortcut with the name of my project. When I tried to see what it pointed to, it pointed to nothing. This means that DMC++ is creating a file with an extension .LNK which perhaps works in windows XP, or whatever version of windows Walter uses, but I think it's what is causing the linker to crash in win98. Cheers!
Jan 29 2004
"dan" <dan_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bvb7fi$1umc$1 digitaldaemon.com...I hadn't seen this before. I went into the output folder to deleteeverything ina last ditch attempt to stop the linker crashing, and I see a symboliclinkthere, with the name of my program. But I know I never created a symboliclink,so the compiler, or the IDDE must have created it. Then I checked itspropertiesto see what it linked to, and it linked to nothing. As far as Windows is concerned, a file with ".lnk" extension that does not link to somethingelse isa corrupt file. Would it be possible to use some extension that isn't reserved? E.g.: ".olk" for Optilink, or ".dml" for DM Linker... Cheers!.lnk files are used to pass a command to the linker, as in: link foo.lnk It has nothing to do with symbolic links, and has been that way since before win98 ever existed.
Jan 29 2004
In article <bvbkug$2klq$2 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says....lnk files are used to pass a command to the linker, as in: link foo.lnk It has nothing to do with symbolic links, and has been that way since before win98 ever existed.Yes, I realize now it's not the problem. Well, it was a shot...
Jan 29 2004