• Mark Evans (6/6) Nov 29 2002 http://www.cuj.com/experts/2002/sutter.htm
• Walter (7/12) Nov 29 2002 adopt

Mark Evans <Mark_member pathlink.com> writes:

http://www.cuj.com/experts/2002/sutter.htm

"...There are still some C99 features, however, that C++0x cannot easily adopt
in their C99 form, because conflicting facilities already exist in C++98..."


So right now I would take STL namespace support and let the C99 / C0x stuff
drift a while in its place.  Namespaces are what people use *today*.

Mark

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"Mark Evans" <Mark_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:as98i7$2853$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 http://www.cuj.com/experts/2002/sutter.htm
 "...There are still some C99 features, however, that C++0x cannot easily

adopt
 in their C99 form, because conflicting facilities already exist in

C++98..."
 So right now I would take STL namespace support and let the C99 / C0x

stuff
 drift a while in its place.  Namespaces are what people use *today*.

I've been working on the namespace support, it's getting a lot better. ADL
lookup is still nowhere, though.